R. Pontremoli et al., Long term effect of nifedipine GITS and lisinopril on subclinical organ damage in patients with essential hypertension, J NEPHROL, 14(1), 2001, pp. 19-26
Background: Preventing subclinical organ damage is currently a major issue
in the management of patients with essential hypertension. Antihypertensive
drugs which act through different pathophysiological mechanisms might conf
er specific target organ protection beyond what is already provided by thei
r blood pressure lowering effect.
Methods: Thirty-one patients with essential hypertension were randomized to
receive long-term treatment with either a calcium channel blocker (nifedip
ine GITS, 90 mg/day) or an ACE-inhibitor (lisinopril, 20 mg/day). Blood pre
ssure, left ventricular mass, carotid wall thickness and timed urinary albu
min excretion were measured at baseline and over the course of 24 months of
treatment.
Results: Both regimens significantly lowered mean blood pressure over the 2
4 months. (from 124+/-2 to 103+/-2 mmHg in the lisinopril group and from 12
2+/-2 to 104+/-1 in the nifedipine group). Overall, end-organ damage improv
ed with persistent blood pressure control. However, the two treatments had
different specific effects. Lisinopril induced a more pronounced reduction
of the left ventricular mass index (from 56 +/-3 to 52+/-2 g/m(2.7), P< 0.0
5) and urinary albumin excretion (from 34+/-15 to 9+/-2 <mu>g/min, P< 0.01)
, while nifedipine achieved a greater reduction of carotid intima plus medi
a thickness (from 0.8+/-0.06 to 0.6+/-0.06 mm, P< 0.01).
Conclusions: Blood pressure control does help reduce the severity of organ
damage in patients with essential hypertension. Different antihypertensive
treatments may confer additional specific cardiorenal and vascular protecti
on regardless of blood pressure control. These data could be useful when de
vising individualized therapeutic strategies in highrisk hypertensive patie
nts.