Recent studies have suggested that V1 neurons extract figures from their ba
ckgrounds, in that they respond better to interior features of figures than
to equivalent features of background stimuli. This is reportedly true even
when the figure boundaries are distant from the borders of the classical r
eceptive field (RF). To test the role of V1 neurons in figure-ground segreg
ation, we recorded their responses to texture figures on texture background
s, centered on the RF. The texture elements of the figures remained identic
al across trials, and figure boundaries were defined by orientation differe
nces between the elements in the background texture relative to elements in
the figure. For nearly all neurons (98/102), responses to a large texture
figure did not differ from the responses to a uniform-texture background. A
lthough many neurons gave enhanced responses to texture boundaries, this oc
curred only when the boundaries were within or close to the RF borders. Sim
ilar effects were found in V2. For neurons in V1, the limited spatial exten
t of the contextual modulation was not increased either at low stimulus con
trast or when the animal was rewarded for detecting an orientation-defined
figure. Thus, V1 neurons appear to signal texture boundaries rather than fi
gures per se. Unexpectedly, many V1 neurons gave significant long-latency r
esponses to texture stimuli located entirely outside the classical RF, up t
o 5 degrees from the RF border in some cases. However, these responses did
not depend on the stimulus forming a figure that contained the RF. Although
V1 neurons are influenced by stimuli outside the classical RF, they do not
appear to segregate figures from ground.