Purpose: Long-term success of distraction osteogenesis depends on the abili
ty of the surrounding soft tissues to tolerate distraction forces and to ad
apt to the resulting increase in skeletal length and volume. The hypothesis
tested in this study was that mandibular elongation by distraction induces
myocyte proliferation.
Materials and Methods: Unilateral mandibular angle osteotomies were perform
ed in 16 Yucatan minipigs. The hemimandibles were lengthened using semiburi
ed distraction devices (Synthes Maxillofacial, Paoli, PA) with 0-day latenc
y, 1, 2, or 4 mm/d distraction rates, and a neutral fixation period of twic
e the gap size in days. In 2 additional animals, the dissection anti osteot
omies were performed, and distraction devices were placed without activatio
n (sham control). At the end of neutral fixation, tissues were taken from m
asseter muscle overlying the osteotomy and the equivalent region on the uno
perated side (contralateral control). Proliferation of myocytes was estimat
ed using immunol histochemical localization with antibodies against prolife
rating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).
Results: Muscle overlying the distracted mandible showed 6-fold more PCNA-p
ositive myocytes (16.8% +/- 11.3%) than the contralateral control side (2.8
% +/- 1.1%, P < .0001). In the 2 sham-control animals, there was a low inde
x of PCNA-positive myocytes on both the osteotomy (2%, 5%) and the contrala
teral sides (1%, 2%).
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that distraction of the porc
ine mandible by the protocol described induces myocyte proliferation in the
masseter muscle. A proliferative response may contribute to improved long-
term stability of mandibular expansion by distraction osteogenesis. (C) 200
1 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.