This paper examines lay and expert perceptions of the ecological risks
associated with a range of human activities that could adversely affe
ct water resource environments. It employs the psychometric paradigm p
ioneered in characterizing perceptions of human health risks, which in
volves surveys to obtain judgments from subjects about risk items in t
erms of several important characteristics of the risks. The paper buil
ds on a previous study that introduced ecological risk perception. Thi
s second study employs a larger, more diverse sample, a more focused t
opic area, and comparisons between lay and expert judgments. The resul
ts confirm that a small set of underlying factors explain a great deal
of variability in lay judgments about ecological risks. These have be
en termed Ecological Impact, Human Benefits, Controllability, and Know
ledge. The results are useful in explaining subjects' judgments of the
general riskiness of, and need for regulation of, various risk items.
The results also indicate several differences and areas of agreement
among the lay and expert samples that point to potential key issues in
future ecological risk management efforts for water resources.