Cf. Bardele, ON THE SYMBIOTIC ORIGIN OF PROTISTS, THEIR DIVERSITY, AND THEIR PIVOTAL ROLE IN TEACHING SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, Italian journal of zoology, 64(2), 1997, pp. 107-113
All multicellular organisms - animals, fungi and plants - are derived
from unicellular protists which themselves arose from symbiotic associ
ations of various prokaryotes. The position of protists in relation to
other living beings and their tremendous genetic diversity is discuss
ed in relation with studies by Sogin and others on comparative sequenc
ing of small subunit ribosomal RNA. Current views on the symbiotic ori
gin of protists and their organelles (nucleus, 9 + 2 flagellum, mitoch
ondria and plastids) are reviewed with particular reference to extant
model organisms from phototrophic dinoflagellates and cryptomonads whi
ch are examples of ''eukaryotes within eukaryotes''. It is emphasised
that in addition to mutation and selection, symbiosis is an equally im
portant motor of evolution in general. Protists currently seem to fall
into three major groups. The early group seems to lack mitochondria p
rimarily and is represented by the Microspora. Giardia, certain amoebo
flagellates, trichomonads and polymastigotes. But recent discovery of
mitochondrial chaperons throws some doubts on this view. The second, m
iddle group contains the Euglenozoa (kinetoplastids, euglenoids) and t
he majority of the former rhizopods. The last one, called crown group,
due to a rapid radiation, gave rise to the alveolates (which contain
the apicomplexean sporozoans and the dinoflagellates, forming together
the sister-group of the ciliates), the heterokont algae including bro
wn algae, plus oomycetes and net-slime molds, the cryptomonads, the ha
ptomonads, and the three main branches with multicellular organisms, e
.g. plants and animals and true fungi, the latter being the sister gro
up of the animals. Finally, some ideas are developed for a unifying co
ncept of reaching ''protistology'' in modern systematic biology. Proti
sts do nor form a monophyletic taxon, but exemplify a particular, unic
ellular organisational level; their classification should avoid any hi
erarchical categories, but search for true sister-group relationships.