Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine whether minimizi
ng requisite processing resources to learn a word list would differentially
improve recall of older adults and to examine the associations between mem
ory and nonmemory cognitive abilities. Background: It has been hypothesized
that a reduction in general processing resources contributes to age-relate
d declines in memory and other cognitive abilities. Methods: Twenty-four yo
ung adults and 47 older adults were administered two semantically related w
ord lists, one list with words blocked into their categories and the other
with categories intermixed. Tests of attention and working memory, language
, and abstract reasoning were interspersed with the memory tasks. Participa
nts were classified as young (age range: 17-30 years), young-old (age range
: 65-73 years), and old-old (age range: 74-87 years) to compare the effects
of List condition (i.e., blocked vs. unblocked) on recall performance. Cor
relation and regression analyses were used to examine the cognitive correla
tes of recall performance. Results: Expected age differences in recall perf
ormance were observed. Based on the resource-reduction hypothesis of cognit
ive aging, we hy pothesized that the blocked presentation of the to-be-reme
mbered list would minimize processing demands and therefore differentially
benefit recall in older elderly participants. Contrary to our prediction, h
owever, the relative benefits of blocked list presentation on recall measur
es were comparable for young and older participants. Correlations and regre
ssion analyses revealed that recall performance was more strongly associate
d with word finding ability than with working memory or abstract reasoning
skills. Conclusions: Results suggest that level of recall of a semantically
related word list and use of semantic clustering as an encoding strategy a
re associated more strongly with general word finding skills than with proc
essing capacity.