F. Watzinger et al., Placement of endosteal implants in the zygoma after maxillectomy: A cadaver study using surgical navigation, PLAS R SURG, 107(3), 2001, pp. 659-667
Endosteal implants facilitate obturator prosthesis fixation in tumor patien
ts after maxillectomy. Previous clinical studies have shown, however, that
the survival of implants placed into available bone after maxillectomy is g
enerally poor. Nevertheless, implants positioned optimally in residual zygo
matic bone provide superior stability from a biomechanical point of view. I
n a pilot study, the authors assessed the precision of VISIT, a computer-ai
ded surgical navigation system dedicated to the placement of endosteal impl
ants in the maxillofacial area. Five cadaver specimens underwent hemimaxill
ectomy. The cadaver head was matched to a preoperative high-resolution comp
uted tomograph by using implanted surgical microscrews as fiducial markers.
The position of a surgical drill relative to the cadaver head was determin
ed with an optical tracking system. Implants were place into the zygomatic
arch, where maximum bone volume was available. The results were assessed us
ing tests for localization accuracy and postoperative computed tomographic
scans of the cadaver specimens. The localization accuracy of landmarks on l
the bony skull was 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm (average +/- SD), as determined with a 5-
df pointer probe; the localization accuracy of the tip of the implant burr
was 1.7 +/- 0.4 rnm. The accuracy of the implant position compared with the
planned position was 1.3 +/- 0.8 mm for the external perforation of the zy
goma and 1.7 +/- 1.3 mm for the internal perforation. Eight of 10 implants
were inserted with maximal contact to surrounding bone, and two implants we
re located unfavorably. Reliable placement of implants in this region is di
fficult to achieve. The technique described in this article may be very hel
pful in the management of patients after maxillary resection with poor supp
ort for obturator prostheses.