The significance of thoracolumbar spinal canal size in spinal cord injury patients

Citation
Ar. Vaccaro et al., The significance of thoracolumbar spinal canal size in spinal cord injury patients, SPINE, 26(4), 2001, pp. 371-376
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
371 - 376
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20010215)26:4<371:TSOTSC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Study Design: A prospective, consecutive case series. Objectives: To determine the relation between spinal canal dimensions and I njury Severity Score and their association with neurologic sequelae after t horacolumbar junction burst fracture. Summary of Background Data: There is a relation in the cervical spine betwe en spinal canal dimension and its association with neurologic sequelae afte r trauma. A similar relation at the thoracolumbar junction has not been con clusively established. Methods: Forty-three patients with thoracolumbar junction burst fractures ( T12-L2),13 with and 30 without neurologic deficit, were included. Computed tomographic scans were used to measure the sagittal and transverse diameter s and the surface area of the spinal canal at the level of injury, as well as one level above and one level below the fracture level. Injury severity score was calculated for both groups. Statistical analysis comparing those with a neurologic deficit to those without was performed by Student's t tes t. Results: The ratio of sagittal-to-transverse diameter at the level of injur y was significantly smaller in patients with a neurologic deficit than in t hose without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.05). The mean transverse diameter at the level of injury was significantly larger in patients with neurologic deficit than in the neurologically intact patients (P < 0.05). The surface area of the canal at the level below the injury was significantly larger i n the patients with a neurologic deficit than in those without a deficit (P < 0.05). Patients with a neurologic deficit had a statistically higher inj ury Severity Score when admitted than those without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.0001), although the difference became insignificant after the neurolog ic component of the scoring system was eliminated. Conclusion: There are no anatomic factors at the thoracolumbar junction tha t predispose to neurologic injury after burst fracture. The shape of the ca nal after injury, however, as determined by the sagittal-to-transverse diam eter ratio, was predictive of neurologic deficit.