Genetic variation in grain-filling ability in dwarf pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] restorer lines

Citation
Fr. Bidinger et al., Genetic variation in grain-filling ability in dwarf pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] restorer lines, THEOR A GEN, 102(2-3), 2001, pp. 387-391
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
ISSN journal
00405752 → ACNP
Volume
102
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
387 - 391
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-5752(200102)102:2-3<387:GVIGAI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The d2 dwarfing gene in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] carri es a yield penalty due to an associated reduction in individual grain mass. This reduction, however, varies with genetic background, indicating that i t may be possible to select against poor grain filling in d2 dwarf backgrou nds, given an effective measure of grain filling. This study was conducted to assess genetic variability for grain-filling ability (in contrast to sim ply grain size), and its relationship to grain yield, in dwarf pearl millet restorer (R) lines. The grain-filling ability (GFA) of an individual R lin e was defined as the least squares estimate of its effect on individual gra in mass in the analysis of variance, following a linear covariance adjustme nt for grain number. The study was based on 93 dwarf hybrids involving 31 d 2 dwarf R-lines, evaluated over 3 years. Half of the variation in individua l grain mass in the 93 hybrids was related to variation in grain number. Co variance adjustment in individual grain mass for grain number resulted in h ighly significant differences among hybrids and R lines in GFA. The R-line combining ability for GFA accounted for 26% of the variation in the R-line combining ability for yield, compared to 46% for the combining ability for grain number, and just 8% for the combining ability of individual grain mas s. The combining ability for GFA was independent of the combining ability f or various pre-flowering effects, including grain number, but was related t o the combining ability for individual grain mass and harvest index. Improv ement in individual grain mass achieved through selection for GFA should tr anslate directly into yield improvement, whereas improvement by direct sele ction for individual grain mass is less-likely to do so.