Aim: The aim of the study is to point out possible examination errors becau
se of a titled transducer, and to analyse their sources. Methods: The resul
ts obtained by experienced examiners using the correct examination techniqu
e were compared to results obtained under defined deviations from the stand
ard. With the use of a computer model the course taken by the ultrasound wa
ves in the neonatal hip was simulated and the sonographic image reconstruct
ed. Results: Twisted as well as tilted positions of the transducer lead to
significant errors in ct, the acetabular roof angle. This is in accordance
with the computer model predictions. Caudo-cranially tilted probes lead to
false-positive, therapeutically relevant incorrect diagnoses. Conclusion: T
he computer simulation predicts a high degree of accuracy of hip sonography
in Graf's technique under standard conditions. The effectiveness of sonogr
aphic infant hip screening largely depends on the ability to adhere to the
standardized approach, minimizing possible errors. A mechanical transducer
guide prevents tilting errors by reducing the degrees of variability in pos
itioning the transducer.