Acute scrotal pain is not a rare emergency department (ED) complaint. Tradi
tional reliance on medical history and physical examination can be precario
us as signs and symptoms can overlap in various etiologies of acute scrotal
pain. Objective: To determine the accuracy with which emergency physicians
(EPs) using bedside ultrasonography are able to evaluate patients presenti
ng to the ED with acute scrotal pain. Methods: The study was performed at a
n urban community hospital ED with a residency program and an annual census
of 70,000. A retrospective chart review identified 36 patients who present
ed with complaints of acute scrotal pain and were evaluated by EPs using be
dside ultrasound. A 5.0- or 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer with color and
power Doppler capability was used to scan the scrotum. Patients were seen b
etween July 1998 and September 1999. Diagnoses were verified by radiology o
r surgery. Sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were c
alculated. Results: The EP ultrasound examinations agreed with confirmatory
studies for 35 of 36 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI =
0.78 to 0.99) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.99). Diagnoses
included three testicular torsions, six cases of epididymitis, four cases o
f orchitis, one testicular fracture, three hernias, three hydroceles, and 1
5 normal examinations. One case of epididymitis was misdiagnosed as an epid
idymal mass. Conclusions: This study suggests that EPs using bedside ultras
onography are able to accurately diagnose patients presenting with acute sc
rotal pain. In addition, they appear able to differentiate between surgical
emergencies, such as testicular torsion, and other etiologies.