Cd. Chisholm et al., Emergency department workplace interruptions: Are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"?, ACAD EM MED, 7(11), 2000, pp. 1239-1243
Objective: Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other wor
k settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences
, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The
authors conducted an observational, time-motion task-analysis study to det
ermine the number and types of interruptions in the ED. Methods: Emergency
physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital
, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A s
ingle investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute perio
ds and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-in-task. An "interruption"
was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subjec
t but did not result in switching to a new task. A "break-in-task" was defi
ned as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than
10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks. Results: The mean (
+/-SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minu
te study period was 12.1 +/- 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performe
d a mean of 67.6 +/- 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interr
uptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 +/- 9.7 and the mean number of
breaks-in-task was 20.7 +/- 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.6
3; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per ob
servation period were positively correlated with the average number of pati
ents simultaneously managed. Conclusions: Emergency physicians are "interru
pt-driven." Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interr
uptions result in breaks-in-task.