E. Zarate et al., The use of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation for preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 92(3), 2001, pp. 629-635
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Nonpharmacologic techniques may be effective in preventing postoperative na
usea and vomiting (PONV). This sham-controlled, double-blinded study was de
signed to examine the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous acupoint electr
ical stimulation (TAES) in a surgical population at high risk of developing
PONV. We studied 221 outpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy w
ith a standardized general anesthetic technique in this randomized, multice
nter trial. In the TAES group, an active ReliefBand(R) (Woodside Biomedical
,Inc., Carlsbad, CA) device was placed at the P6 acupoint, whereas in the S
ham and Placebo groups, an inactive device was applied at the P6 acupoint a
nd at the dorsal aspect of the wrist, respectively. The ReliefBand was appl
ied after completion of electrocautery and remained in place for 9 h after
surgery. The incidence of PONV and need for "rescue" medication were evalua
ted at predetermined time intervals. TAES was associated with a significant
ly decreased incidence of moderate-to-severe nausea as denoted on the Funct
ional Living Index-Emesis score for up to 9 h after surgery (5%-11% for the
TAES group vs 16%-38% [P < 0.05] and 15%-26% [P < 0.05] for Sham and Place
bo groups, respectively). TAES was also associated with a larger proportion
of patients free from moderate to severe nausea symptoms (73% vs 41% and 4
9% for Sham and Placebo groups, respectively; P < 0.05). However, there wer
e no statistically significant differences among the three groups with rega
rd to incidence of vomiting or the need for rescue antiemetic drugs. We con
clude that TAES with the ReliefBand at the P6 acupoint reduces nausea, but
not vomiting, after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.