Mc. Lin et al., Pulmonary function and spinal characteristics: Their relationships in persons with idiopathic and postpoliomyelitic scoliosis, ARCH PHYS M, 82(3), 2001, pp. 335-341
Objective: To identify what influence the various features of spinal deform
ity have on pulmonary function in persons with idiopathic and the postpolio
myelitic scoliosis.
Design: Prospective, cohort, observational study with clinical and radiolog
ic evaluations.
Setting: Hospital-based rehabilitation units.
Patients: Forty-four patients with idiopathic scoliotis and 16 with postpol
iomyelitic scoliotis. Each group was divided into subgroups: normal and abn
ormal pulmonary function.
Intervention: Clinical and radiologic evaluation of spinal deformity, full
pulmonary functional test and respiratory muscle strength were performed. P
resence of dyspnea on exertion and low back pain (LBP) was recorded.
Main Outcome Measures: Pulmonary function: spirometry, lung volume test, an
d diffusing capacity. Respiratory muscle strength: maximal inspiratory pres
sure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). Presence of dyspnea on ex
ertion (DOE), and LBP were also recorded. Characteristics of spinal deformi
ty: direction of convexity, uppermost vertebra, number of involved vertebra
e, Cobb angle, the apical vertebra, degree of rotation at the apical verteb
ra, type of scoliotic curve, and presence of balanced spine and pelvic obli
quity. Chi-square analyses and Mann-Whitney U test for between-groups compa
risons. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient to determine the existence a
nd magnitude of a relationship.
Results: We found significant differences between the idiopathic and postpo
liomyelitis groups in the degree of rotation at the apical vertebra, MIP, a
verage percentage of predicted vital capacity, residual volume/total lung c
apacity, presence of double or triple curves, pelvic obliquity, and DOE. Be
tween the idiopathic scoliotis subgroups we found significant differences i
n the uppermost vertebra and number of vertebrae in the scoliotic curve. Be
tween the subgroups of the postpoliomyelitis group were significant differe
nces in the location of the apical vertebra and the uppermost vertebral bod
y of scoliotic curve. In the idiopathic group, pulmonary function was mostl
y related to scoliotic angle, number of vertebrae in the scoliotic curve, l
ocation of the uppermost vertebra, and the patients' age; MIP and MEP were
negatively related to the scoliotic angle and degree of rotation of apical
vertebra. In the postpoliomyelitis group, pulmonary function was mostly rel
ated to scoliotic angle, kyphotic angle, location of the uppermost vertebra
of the scoliotic curve, and age.
Conclusion: No single factor can predict the severity of impairment in scol
iotic patients' pulmonary function. In both groups, severity of pulmonary i
mpairment was related to the combined features of the spinal deformity. How
ever, uppermost vertebra, scoliotic angle, and patient's age may play impor
tant roles influencing pulmonary function in both groups.