Purpose: Arthroscopic evaluation of the articular surface by visualization
and palpation has proved to be unreliable; therefore, we investigated arthr
oscopically procured biopsy specimens and conventional sections by using th
e same histopathomorphologic techniques and compared the results for possib
le differences. Methods: Cartilage biopsy specimens of 1.7 mm in diameter a
nd conventional cartilage sections (pieces of 8 x 2 mm) were removed from t
he lateral femoral condyle of 53 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total k
nee arthroplasty. Biopsies and conventional sections were evaluated histolo
gically by using Mankin's grading system and immunohistochemically by asses
sing the immunoreactivity of the chondrocytes to MMP-1 and MMP-3. Results:
The comparison between the biopsies and conventional sections revealed that
then were no differences between these forms of obtaining specimens. Moreo
ver, the expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in biopsy specimens showed a strong
correlation with that in conventional sections. Conclusions: We conclude th
at in small biopsy specimens taken (e.g., during arthoscopy), the histologi
cal grading of osteoarthritis severity and the evaluation of MMP expression
yield results similar to those obtained in conventional sections.