Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinomain situ
N. Bijker et al., Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinomain situ, BR J CANC, 84(4), 2001, pp. 539-544
We have investigated primary ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) of the breast
and their local recurrences after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for hist
ological characteristics and marker expression. Patients who were randomize
d in the EORTC trial 10853 (wide local excision versus excision plus radiot
herapy) and who developed a local recurrence were identified. Histology was
reviewed for 116 cases; oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, and HE
R2/neu and p53 overexpression were assessed for 71 cases. Comparing the pri
mary DCIS and the invasive or non-invasive recurrence, concordant histology
was found in 62%, and identical marker expression in 63%. Although 11% of
the recurrences developed at a distance from the primary DCIS, nearly all t
hese showed the same histological and immunohistochemical profile. 5 patien
ts developed well-differentiated DCIS or grade 1 invasive carcinoma after p
oorly differentiated DCIS, Although these recurrences occurred in the same
quadrant as the primary DCIS, they may be considered as second primary tumo
urs. Only 4 patients developed poorly differentiated DCIS or grade III inva
sive carcinoma after well differentiated DCIS, We conclude that in most cas
es the primary DCIS and its local recurrence are related histologically or
by marker expression. suggesting that local recurrence usually reflects out
growth of residual DCIS; progression of well differentiated DCIS towards po
orly differentiated DCIS or grade III invasive carcinoma is a non-frequent
event. (C) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.