S. Srinivas et al., CRYSTALLIZATION AND MORPHOLOGY OF POLY(ARYLENE ETHER ETHER SULFIDE)S - DUAL SPHERULITIC MORPHOLOGY, Journal of macromolecular science. Physics, 36(4), 1997, pp. 455-474
Spherulitic growth rate and morphological studies carried out on a nov
el poly(ether ether sulfide) yielded dual spherulitic morphologies at
all crystallization temperatures. Distinct populations of two kinds of
spherulites were formed, with a population of coarse-textured spherul
ites exhibiting higher growth rate (Type II) than a population of fine
-textured spherulites (Type I), at all temperatures studied. The growt
h rate dependence on temperature for the Type I spherulites was consis
tent with the theoretically predicted ''bell-shaped'' curve, indicatin
g nucleation-controlled growth at temperatures close to the melting te
mperature and diffusion-controlled growth at temperatures closer to th
e glass transition temperature. The growth rate of the Type II spherul
ites, however, surprisingly did not exhibit any diffusion-controlled r
egime, with the growth rate increasing with decreasing temperature acr
oss the whole range of temperatures studied here. The above described
phenomenon was found to be independent of the prior melt and crystalli
zation history and nature of the substrate in all cases except one. Th
e morphology of the different spherulites has been studied with a comb
ination of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and atomi
c force microscopy. The Type II spherulites exhibited a coarser and mo
re ''open'' morphology, with thicker bundles of fibrils and large inte
rfibrillar gaps, radiating outward from the center of the spherulite.
The Type I spherulites were found to exhibit curvature indicative of s
pherical behavior, whereas the Type II spherulites appeared to exhibit
a flat disklike appearance; this finding is consistent with film thic
knesses in that samples exhibiting Type I spherulites were films of th
ickness > 50 mu m, whereas Type II spherulites were grown in films of
thickness of similar to 10 mu m. The differences in the growth rate an
d morphology between the Type I and Type II spherulites have, thus, be
en attributed to differences in film sample thickness; the causes behi
nd such effects, however, still remain unclear.