Objectives: To assess the variability of general dental practitioners (GDPs
) in measurement of radiomorphometric indices on panoramic radiographs foll
owing basic instruction and to examine whether the variability could be red
uced by more individualised instruction.
Methods: Nine GDPs measured Gonion Index (GI), Antegonion Index (AI), Menta
l Index (MI) and Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) on copies of 10 panoramic
radiographs following a lecture on osteoporosis and the use of radiomorphom
etric indices. Their measurements were related to expert-derived measuremen
ts of the same copy radiographs. Mean differences and limits of agreement (
2 x standard deviation of differences) were calculated for quantitative ind
ices (GI, AI, MI) and agreement of GDPs with expert-derived MCI assessments
was determined using weighted kappa. Following individualised feedback to
GDPs, all measurements were repeated after 2 weeks and the statistical anal
ysis repeated.
Results: There was extensive variation amongst GDPs in measurement of GI. A
I and MI and in assessment of MCI. There was a general tendency of GDPs to
record thicker mandibular cortices than did the experts. Limits of agreemen
t were wide relative to the mean values of each quantitative index at both
readings. Agreement of the GDPs with experts in assessment of MCI was moder
ate at both readings, but with a wide range in assessment.
Conclusions: Variability in measuring radiomorphometric indices amongst the
GDPs was high and was not predictably improved by individualised instructi
on. This study casts considerable doubt on the potential value of radiomorp
hometric indices given their lack of precision.