Variability in measurement of radiomorphometric indices by general dental practitioners

Citation
Cv. Devlin et al., Variability in measurement of radiomorphometric indices by general dental practitioners, DENTOMAX R, 30(2), 2001, pp. 120-125
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
0250832X → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
120 - 125
Database
ISI
SICI code
0250-832X(200103)30:2<120:VIMORI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the variability of general dental practitioners (GDPs ) in measurement of radiomorphometric indices on panoramic radiographs foll owing basic instruction and to examine whether the variability could be red uced by more individualised instruction. Methods: Nine GDPs measured Gonion Index (GI), Antegonion Index (AI), Menta l Index (MI) and Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) on copies of 10 panoramic radiographs following a lecture on osteoporosis and the use of radiomorphom etric indices. Their measurements were related to expert-derived measuremen ts of the same copy radiographs. Mean differences and limits of agreement ( 2 x standard deviation of differences) were calculated for quantitative ind ices (GI, AI, MI) and agreement of GDPs with expert-derived MCI assessments was determined using weighted kappa. Following individualised feedback to GDPs, all measurements were repeated after 2 weeks and the statistical anal ysis repeated. Results: There was extensive variation amongst GDPs in measurement of GI. A I and MI and in assessment of MCI. There was a general tendency of GDPs to record thicker mandibular cortices than did the experts. Limits of agreemen t were wide relative to the mean values of each quantitative index at both readings. Agreement of the GDPs with experts in assessment of MCI was moder ate at both readings, but with a wide range in assessment. Conclusions: Variability in measuring radiomorphometric indices amongst the GDPs was high and was not predictably improved by individualised instructi on. This study casts considerable doubt on the potential value of radiomorp hometric indices given their lack of precision.