Lipid transfer protein activities in type 1 diabetic patients without renal failure and nondiabetic control subjects and their association with coronary artery calcification
Hm. Colhoun et al., Lipid transfer protein activities in type 1 diabetic patients without renal failure and nondiabetic control subjects and their association with coronary artery calcification, DIABETES, 50(3), 2001, pp. 652-659
This study examined the role of cholesteryl ester transfer (CET), cholester
yl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, and phospholipid transfer protei
n (PLTP) activity in the increased prevalence of coronary artery calcificat
ion (CAC) in diabetic subjects compared with nondiabetic subjects and in th
e loss of the sex difference in CAC in diabetes. CETP activity, PLTP activi
ty, and CET were measured in 195 type 1 diabetic subjects without renal fai
lure and 194 nondiabetic control subjects of similar age (30-55 years) and
sex distribution (50% female). CAC was quantified with electron beam comput
ed tomography. CETP activity was higher in diabetic subjects (mean 84 arbit
rary units [AU]) than in nondiabetic subjects (80 AU, P = 0.028). PLTP acti
vity was also higher in diabetic subjects (96 AU) than in nondiabetic subje
cts (81 AU, P < 0.001). However, CET was lower in diabetic men (geometric m
ean 32 nmol ml(-1) . h(-1)) than nondiabetic men (37 nmol . ml(-1) . h(-1),
P = 0.004) and did not differ between diabetic (30 nmol ml(-1) . h(-1)) an
d nondiabetic (32 nmol . ml(-1) . h(-1), P = 0.3) women. CETP and PLTP acti
vities were not associated with CAC. CET was positively associated with CAC
in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (odds ratio per 10 nmol . ml(-1)
. h(-1) increase in CET in all subjects = 1.4, P = 0.001). The prevalence
of CAC was similar in diabetic (51%) and nondiabetic (54%, P = 0.7) men but
was much higher in diabetic (47%) than nondiabetic (21%, odds ratio 3.6, P
< 0.001) women so that there was no sex difference in CAC in diabetic subj
ects. The odds of CAC in diabetic women compared with nondiabetic women was
altered little by adjustment for CETP activity, PLTP activity, or CET (odd
s ratio on adjustment 3.7, P < 0.001). The greater effect of diabetes on CA
C in women than in men, i.e., the loss of the sex difference in CAC, was in
dependent of CETP and PLTP activity and GET. In conclusion, among both diab
etic and nondiabetic subjects, higher cholesteryl ester transfer is a risk
factor for CAC. However, abnormalities in cholesteryl ester transfer or lip
id transfer protein activities do not underlie the increased CAC risk in di
abetic women compared with nondiabetic women or the loss of the sex differe
nce in CAC in diabetes.