R. Mcglone et al., A comparison of intramuscular ketamine with high dose intramuscular midazolam with and without intranasal flumazenil in children before suturing, EMERG MED J, 18(1), 2001, pp. 34-38
Objectives-(a) To compare the use of high dose intramuscular midazolam with
and without intranasal flumazenil in children after suturing. (b) To compa
re the use of high dose intramuscular midazolam with low dose intramuscular
ketamine in children before suturing.
Methods-87 children, aged between 1 and 7 years, presenting with simple wou
nds needing sedation, were studied. Children considered combative (n=47) we
re given ketamine (2.5 mg/kg intramuscularly). The remaining 40 children we
re given midazolam (0.4 mg/kg intramuscularly) with and without flumazenil
(25 mug/kg, intranasally).
Results-The median oxygen saturation was 97% in both midazolam groups. Flum
azenil significantly reduced the amount of agitation during recovery (p=0.0
48) and also the time at which children were ready for discharge (median 55
versus 95 minutes, p value <0.001). After discharge both midazolam groups
had an unsteady gait (75%) and there was no significant difference in the d
uration. As expected because of the deliberate selection of combative child
ren into the ketamine group, the pre-sedation behaviour was slightly more d
isturbed compared with the midazolam group (p=0.10). However, the ketamine
group was less agitated during local anaesthetic and suturing p<0.001.
Conclusion-Intramuscular midazolam (0.4 mg/kg) did not effectively sedate t
he children, in that a significant number still had to be restrained. Howev
er, none could remember the suturing. Intranasal flumazenil seems to be eff
ective in shortening the time to discharge. If midazolam is to be used then
a dose high enough to produce full amnesia should be used, there seems to
be no advantage in increasing the dose further. Low dose intramuscular keta
mine remains the drug of choice.