Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation

Citation
Jp. Acworth et al., Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation, EMERG MED J, 18(1), 2001, pp. 39-45
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL
ISSN journal
14720205 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
39 - 45
Database
ISI
SICI code
1472-0205(200101)18:1<39:IKPMIS>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objectives-This study compared intranasal midazolam (INM) with a combinatio n of intravenous ketamine and intravenous midazolam (IVKM) for sedation of children requiring minor procedures in the emergency department. Method-A single blinded randomised clinical trial was conducted in the emer gency department of a major urban paediatric hospital. Subjects requiring s edation for minor procedures were randomised to receive either INM (0.4 mg/ kg) or intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg) plus intravenous midazolam (0.1 mg/kg ). Physiological variables and two independent measures of sedation (Sedati on Score and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale) were recorded before sedation and at regular intervals during the procedure and recovery period. Times to adequate level of sedation and to discharge were compared. Results-Fifty three patients were enrolled over a 10 month period. Sedation was sufficient to complete the procedures in all children receiving IVKM a nd in 24 of the 26 receiving INM. Onset of sedation was an average of 5.3 m inutes quicker with IVKM than with INM (95%CI3.2, 7.4 minutes, p<0.001). Ch ildren given INM were discharged an average of 19 minutes earlier than thos e given IVKM (95%CI 4, 33 minutes, p=0.02). Mean Sedation Scores and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale scores for the 30 minutes after drug administratio n were significantly better in children given IVKM compared with INM (2.4 a nd 1.8 versus 3.5 and 3.8, respectively). Both doctors and parents were mor e satisfied with sedation by intravenous ketamine and midazolam. Conclusions-Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam used in an appropriate sett ing by experienced personnel provides an excellent means of achieving sedat ion suitable for most non-painful minor procedures for children in the emer gency department. This combination is superior to TNM in terms of speed of onset and consistency of effect. INM delivered via aerosol spray has a more variable effect but may still be adequate for the completion of many of th ese procedures.