Ke. Trewhella et al., INSECT INDUCED RESISTANCE IN LODGEPOLE PINE - EFFECTS ON 2 PINE FEEDING INSECTS, Journal of applied entomology, 121(3), 1997, pp. 129-136
A series of experiments was performed in order to establish if the ins
ect defoliators Panolis flammea (D&S) (Lept., Noctuidae) and Neodiprio
n sertifer (Geoff.) (Hym., Dripionidae) cause an induced response in l
odgepole pine, Pious contorta, and if so, what affect this response is
likely to have on the two insects. Survival and growth of P. flammea
was significantly affected by defoliation of seedling Skeena River lod
gepole pine (KLP). On mature foliage from one forest site P. flammea l
arvae showed no significant difference in feeding preference between h
eavily defoliated trees and trees with less than 10% defoliation. On f
oliage from another forest site P. flammea larvae preferred trees with
no previous defoliation. N. sertifer larvae significantly preferred f
oliage from previously defoliated trees. Insect defoliation of mature
trees resulted in significant changes in the terpenoid compounds in le
af and stem resins. It is possible that both P. flammea and N. sertife
r are affected by the carbon-nutrient balance of their host. It seems
that P. flammea however, unlike N. sertifer, is also affected by induc
ed defences in lodgepole pine, particularly in younger trees. These di
fferences are probably related to the feeding strategies of the two in
sects: P. flammea feeds on both current and previous year foliage, whi
le N. sertifer feeds only on previous year foliage. The outbreak dynam
ics of P. flammea and N. sertifer in commercial lodgepole pine plantat
ions are discussed in light of the results obtained.