Spinal cord injured (SCI) people try to compensate for the loss of postural
muscle function by increased use of non-postural muscles. Such alternative
muscle use, however, may necessitate important modifications in motor cont
rol. In this study motor programming processes were investigated in three g
roups, i.e. in high thoracic SCI, low thoracic SCI and non-SCI subjects. A
bimanual forward-reaching task, in which graded sitting balance perturbatio
n was systematically invoked, was presented to the subjects as a visual pre
cue choice reaction time (RT) task. Effects of movement preparation were ex
amined by precuing reaching distance information. RT and movement times wer
e recorded. Centre of pressure (CP) displacement was used as an indicator f
or sitting balance perturbation. Results indicated that high thoracic SCI s
ubjects programmed balance-perturbing reaching movements as fast as did non
-SCI subjects. Low thoracic SCI subjects, on the other hand, showed substan
tially longer programming times. This latter outcome is consistent with the
hypothesis that the low thoracic SCI subjects adopted a more complex postu
ral control strategy involving residual motor functions in an attempt to ac
tively compensate for loss of postural muscle function. High thoracic SCI s
ubjects, on the other hand, appeared to adopt a less complex and thus easie
r to programme postural control strategy.