Continuous time Markov chain (CTMC) models offer ethologists a powerful too
l. The methods are based on well-established procedures for estimating the
rates at which one state (e.g. resting) changes to some other set of states
(e.g. feeding, fighting, etc.). Unfortunately, ethological data typically
differ in a very critical manner from the type of data to which these metho
ds are usually applied: ethological data are usually heavily censored in th
e sense that each behavioral state shows frequent transitions to several ot
her possible states. This occurs when several competing processes can each
end a bout.
We used computer simulation of various behavioral models with known transit
ion rates to investigate the unknown performance of four of the most popula
r statistical tests for screening data prior to application of CTMC models;
this included a modification of one of these tests derived under the assum
ption of random censoring. Two of the four tests failed completely and woul
d result in rejection of nearly all data even if the model did fit the assu
mptions of the CTMC methods. Only Barlow's total-time-on test performed wit
h an acceptable a error rate under all conditions. None of the tests were p
articularly effective at detecting certain types of departures from the CTM
C assumptions.
Guidelines are given as to how much confidence should be attached to appare
nt changes in transition rates.