The standard assumption of modern social choice theory is that the individu
als are endowed with complete and transitive preference relations over the
decision alternatives. A large number of incompatibility results has been a
chieved regarding aggregation of these kinds of preferences. Yet, most voti
ng procedures make no use of this information. Instead they essentially cut
down the information provided by the voters. In this paper we deal with so
me alternatives to the complete and transitive voter preference assumption.
Particular attention is paid to imprecise notions: probabilistic and fuzzy
preference relations. Rather than establishing new impossibility results,
our focus is in resolving various voting paradoxes using imprecise preferen
ce concepts.