J. Popelar et al., Effects of contralateral acoustical stimulation on three measures of cochlear function in the guinea pig, HEARING RES, 152(1-2), 2001, pp. 128-138
The magnitudes of suppression of the click-evoked compound action potential
of the auditory nerve (CAP), transient click-evoked otoacoustic emissions
(TEOAEs) and ensemble background activity of the auditory nerve (EBA), elic
ited by contralateral acoustical stimulation, were compared in awake or lig
htly sedated guinea pigs. The contralateral ear was stimulated either by co
ntinuous broad-band noise or by low-pass or high-pass noise (intensity 41-6
2 dB SPL) with cut-off frequencies of 2, 8 and 12 kHz. The maximal suppress
ion of TEOAEs was achieved by contralateral noise containing mainly low fre
quencies, whereas for suppression of the CAP it was necessary for middle fr
equencies to be present in the contralateral noise (less than 8 kHz). in co
ntrast to this, EBA was suppressed mainly by high-frequency noise (higher t
han 8 kHz) whereas low- and middle-frequency noise was ineffective in suppr
essing EBA. Evaluation of the root mean square voltage of the EBA (filtered
in frequency range 0.75-1.25 kHz) enabled the evaluation of fast and slow
components of olivocochlear activation. Both fast and dow effects were prop
ortionally suppressed by individual types of contralateral stimulation. The
mechanisms of TEOAEs and CAP generation has been confirmed in many earlier
studies, but the origin of EBA has yet to be fully elucidated. The obtaine
d data support the hypothesis that a large part of EBA is formed by spontan
eous activity of high-frequency-tuned auditory nerve fibres. Suppression of
the EBA magnitude during contralateral stimulation may be caused either by
a reduced spontaneous firing rate or by a decrease in possible synchronise
d neuronal firing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.