Satisfying non-trivial information needs involves collecting information fr
om multiple resources, and synthesizing an answer that organizes that infor
mation. Traditional recall/precision-oriented information retrieval focuses
on just one phase of that process: how to efficiently and effectively iden
tify documents likely to be relevant to a specific, focused query, The TREC
Interactive Track has as its goal the location of documents that pertain t
o different instances of a query topic, with no reward for duplicated cover
age of topic instances. This task is similar to the task of organizing answ
er components into a complete answer. Clustering and classification are two
mechanisms for organizing documents into groups. In this paper, we present
an ongoing series of experiments that test the feasibility and effectivene
ss of using clustering and classification as an aid to instance retrieval a
nd, ultimately, answer construction. Our results show that users prefer suc
h structured presentations of candidate result set to a list-based approach
. Assessment of the structured organizations based on the subjective judgem
ent of the experiment subjects suggests that the structured organization ca
n be more effective; however, assessment based on objective judgements show
s mixed results. These results indicate that a full determination of the su
ccess of the approach depends on assessing the quality of the final answers
generated by users, rather than on performance during the intermediate sta
ges of answer construction. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser
ved.