Atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) are characterized by man
y features but especially by: (1) the manner of discretizing the gover
ning equations and of representing the variables involved at a given r
esolution, and (2) the manner of parameterizing unresolved physical pr
ocesses in terms of those resolved variables. These two aspects of mod
el formulation are not independent and it is difficult to untangle the
ir intertwined effects when assessing model performance. The attempt h
ere is to separate these aspects of GCM behaviour and to ask, ''Given
a perfect parameterization of the physical processes in a model, what
resolution is needed to capture the dominant dynamical aspects of the
atmospheric climate?'' Alternatively, ''At what resolution do the dyna
mics of a GCM converge''? The perfect parameterization approach assume
s that the calculation of the physical terms returns the ''correct'' r
esult at all resolutions. In the idealized case, a time-independent fo
rcing is one of the simplest that satisfies this condition. However, e
xperiments show that it is difficult for the dynamics of a GCM to bala
nce a time-independent forcing with atmosphere-like flows and structur
es. The model requires, and the atmosphere presumably includes, physic
al feedback mechanisms which act so as to maintain the kinds of flows
and structures that are observed. Resolution experiments are performed
with a simplified forcing function for the thermodynamic equation whi
ch combines a dominant time-independent specified forcing with a weak
linear relaxation feedback. These experiments show that the dynamics o
f the GCM have essentially converged at T32 and certainly by T63 which
is the next resolution considered. This is shown by the constancy of
structures, variances, covariances, transports and energy budgets with
increasing resolution. Experiments with an alternative forcing propos
ed by Held and Suarez, which has the form of a linear relaxation, show
somewhat less evidence of convergence at these resolutions. In both c
ases the ''physics'' are known by assumption. However, the form and na
ture of the forcing is different, as is the behaviour with resolution.
The implication for the real system is that the resolution required f
or simulating the dynamical aspects of climate is rather modest. The s
imulated climate does, however, apparently depend on the ability to co
rrectly and consistently parameterize the physical processes in a GCM,
involving both forcing and feedback mechanisms, as a function of reso
lution.