The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM) - Failure to predict the outcome of lumbar discectomy

Citation
Jl. Hobby et al., The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM) - Failure to predict the outcome of lumbar discectomy, J BONE-BR V, 83B(1), 2001, pp. 19-21
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
ISSN journal
0301620X → ACNP
Volume
83B
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
19 - 21
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-620X(200101)83B:1<19:TDARAM>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Our aim was to judge the influence of preoperative psychological disturbanc e on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. We evaluated 66 patients, before and after operation, using a self-administered questionnaire. Disability was a ssessed using the Oswestry disability index and psychological disturbance t he Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) score. Patients were classifi ed as normal, at risk or distressed, and the outcome of surgery in the thre e groups was compared at a follow-up of six months. The mean self-reported preoperative disability was significantly higher in those with psychological disturbance. A total of 54 patients (82%) returned completed postoperative questionnaires, Postoperative disability scores at six months were not significantly different in the three risk groups. Psyc hological disturbance improved after surgery. Our study suggests that the e arly outcome of lumbar discectomy is not affected by preoperative psycholog ical disturbance. We conclude that a patient with a symptomatic prolapsed i ntervertebral disc should not be denied surgery on the basis of preoperativ e psychological assessment.