Objective: To review the literature that describes and evaluates the use of
isometric back extension endurance tests.
Data Collection: Relevant articles in English were retrieved through a sear
ch of MEDLINE and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Key search terms we
re back muscle endurance, isometric back endurance, trunk extensors, back m
uscle performance, and Sorensen test.
Data Synthesis: The principal criterion for inclusion was as follows: any s
tudy that discussed or tested an isometric type of back endurance extension
test. Studies that were excluded did not use an isometric testing protocol
. Thirty-seven of the initial studies are included in this review.
Results: Six different types of isometric back extension endurance testing
methods were found. Three of these procedures require special testing devic
es. Much of the research on this topic has centered on a procedure known as
the Sorensen test. Normative databases have been established for the Soren
sen test and 2 other test types. Validity and reliability have been assesse
d for some of the procedures.
Conclusions: The influence of motivation and effort exerted by the subject
are limiting factors in all of the tests reviewed. These psychologic factor
s warrant further research. On the basis of the literature reviewed, we det
ermined that the Sorensen is probably the most clinically useful of these t
ests; it is easy to perform, requires no special equipment, and enjoys the
most support from the literature.