The current paper models power-maximizing politicians' behavior subject to
imperfect political competition and perfect citizen mobility. It then analy
zes the welfare implications of federal and non-federal structures. The mod
el abstracts from both heterogeneous preferences (the most common argument
in favor of federalism) and externalities (the most common argument against
), showing that even in this simplified setting federalism has important we
lfare implications. There is one class of equilibria in which more federali
sm has the purely beneficial effect of offsetting imperfections in the poli
tical process. However, there is also a second class of equilibria in which
citizen mobility makes political imperfections more severe by creating 'sa
fe districts' for both political parties. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. Al
l rights reserved.