Management of ectatic, nonaneurysmal iliac arteries during endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair

Citation
La. Karch et al., Management of ectatic, nonaneurysmal iliac arteries during endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair, J VASC SURG, 33(2), 2001, pp. S33-S38
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
S
Pages
S33 - S38
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(200102)33:2<S33:MOENIA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Purpose: Most endografts for an endoluminal AAA repair cannot achieve an ad equate hemostatic seal in ectatic common iliac arteries larger than 14 mm. The extension of the endograft into the external iliac artery can alleviate this problem but requires sacrifice of the internal iliac artery. We have used the larger diameter aortic extension cuff to obtain adequate endograft to arterial wall apposition in patients with ectatic, nonaneurysmal common iliac arteries. Because of the resultant flared configuration of the iliac limb, the technique is termed bell-bottom. However, it is unknown whether subsequent enlargement of these ectatic common iliac arteries that will lea d to endoleaks or endograft migration will occur. Methods: The records of all 96 patients who have undergone endoluminal abdo minal aortic aneurysm repair at our institution were reviewed. Fourteen pat ients were identified in whom aortic extension cuffs were placed into 18 ec tatic (>14 mm, but <20 mm) common iliac arteries. The mean follow-up time w as 14 months (range, 6-24 months). The maximal diameter of the common iliac artery on computed tomography scan before endograft placement was compared with the maximal diameter at the most recent follow-up. The incidence of e ndoleaks, ruptures, and endograft migration related to the "bell-bottom" te chnique were recorded. Results: The mean preoperative common iliac artery diameter was 18 mm (rang e, 15-20 mm). Aortic extension cuffs of 20-mm diameter and 24-mm diameter w ere used in 14 and 4 common iliac arteries, respectively. The diameter did not change in 11 common iliac arteries (61%), increased by 1 mm in 4 common iliac arteries (22%), and decreased by 1 mm in 3 common iliac arteries (17 %). No endoleaks, ruptures, or endograft migration related to this techniqu e was identified. Conclusion: The use of aortic extension cuffs for ectatic common iliac arte ries expands the number of patients who can be treated endoluminally withou t sacrifice of the internal iliac artery. Most common iliac arteries do not increase in diameter. When enlargement occurs, the degree of dilation is m inimal. Therefore, the "bell-bottom" technique appears to be an acceptable option in the management of large, nonaneurysmal iliac vessels during endol uminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.