Concerns for the durability of the proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a 2-year and 3-year longitudinal computed tomography angiography study

Citation
M. Prinssen et al., Concerns for the durability of the proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a 2-year and 3-year longitudinal computed tomography angiography study, J VASC SURG, 33(2), 2001, pp. S64-S69
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
S
Pages
S64 - S69
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(200102)33:2<S64:CFTDOT>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective: To provide a long-term perspective on the durability of the prox imal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a single device seri es with perpendicular neck measurements in two groups of patients with comp lete 2- and 3-year follow-up. Design: This was a prospective study of postoperative, radiologic images. Setting: The study used a referral center, institutional practice, and ambu latory patients. Subjects: From January 1994 until May 1998, 37 endografts were implanted fo r abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the first postoperative year, there were fo ur unrelated deaths and six conversions, leaving 27 patients with complete 24-month data and 13 with complete 36-month data. Main Outcome Measure: Computed tomography angiograms were processed on a wo rk station to measure the neck per pendicular to the central lumen line of the aorta. The surface area at the proximal endovascular anastomosis was re corded at each follow-up interval and related to the postoperative size at the same level. Results: Significant dilatation of the surface area was found: 20% (16% to 27%) at 24 months (c(2) = 30; P < .001, Friedman) and 23% (18% to 28%) at 3 6 months (c(2) = 27; P < .001, Friedman). This increase in neck size was co ntinuous and linear, with a yearly rate of approximately 10% surface area; translated into diameter, this approximates 1 mm/y. Conclusion: A continuous aortic enlargement of approximately 1 mm/y at the level of the proximal endovascular anastomosis was found. Because of the pr actice of oversizing the endograft relative to the infrarenal aortic neck, a loss of the endovascular seal may not become apparent until several years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is performed.