Changes to the landscape pattern of coastal North Carolina wetlands under the Clean Water Act, 1984-1992

Authors
Citation
Nm. Kelly, Changes to the landscape pattern of coastal North Carolina wetlands under the Clean Water Act, 1984-1992, LANDSC ECOL, 16(1), 2001, pp. 3-16
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
09212973 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
3 - 16
Database
ISI
SICI code
0921-2973(200101)16:1<3:CTTLPO>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Wetland management in the United States is organized through a permit proce ss that requires a permit be filed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pr ior to wetland alteration. A collection of these permits from 1984 through 1992 was analyzed in conjunction with classified Landsat Thematic Mapper da ta from 1984 and 1992 in order to quantify changes to wetland habitat in th e study area in coastal North Carolina. The wetland management process in t he U.S. focuses on a site-by-site review, possibly overlooking important ch anges to wetlands at the landscape-scale. These the two datasets were used to determine if wetland habitat loss was occurring at permit sites, but als o to determine if landscape-scale wetland fragmentation and reorganization were occurring in the area surrounding each permit site under the wetland m anagement process. The use of these two datasets attempted to span two scal es: the site-specific scale often used in the management of wetlands, and t he landscape-scale where effects of such management are evident. Important conclusions from the research include the following. First, while several s ources imply that coastal wetlands are disproportionately protected as a re sult of the widespread recognition of their habitat value, estuarine wetlan ds were altered much more frequently in the study area than their inland co unterparts. Second, despite federal level efforts that require compensatory mitigation when wetland habitat is lost, such mitigation was required in o nly three percent of permits, ensuring wetland loss. Third, correlation bet ween estimates of wetland loss from the Permit Record and from the remotely sensed record was minimal, highlighting the problems inherent to wetland d elineation and implying alterations to habitat not evidenced in the permit record. Finally, landscape-scale changes of loss, fragmentation and habitat reorganization have occurred in estuarine emergent wetland habitat in area s adjacent to several permit sites, implying unanticipated additional impac ts to permitted actions. Wetland loss at the permit site occurred with addi tional fragmentation in 80 percent of the sites examined. The results highl ight the lack of agreement between management and landscape-scale wetland s tructure, function and change, and imply the importance of examining the sp atial context of permit sites in the permit review and evaluation procedure .