A demographic study of the clinical significance of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Citation
D. Levett et al., A demographic study of the clinical significance of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MED PED ONC, 36(3), 2001, pp. 365-371
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
00981532 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
365 - 371
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-1532(200103)36:3<365:ADSOTC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Background. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detected during remission might predict outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. No populatio n-based studies have been carried out. We studied all children with ALL pre senting over 5 years within a defined Population to determine its clinical importance. Procedure. Patients were investigated for the presence of uniqu e clonal rearrangements of IgH acid T-cell receptor genes. Unique patient s pecific probes were used to detect, by polymerase chain reaction, the prese nce of clonal markers indicating MRD in mononuclear cells obtained from mar row samples at 1, 3, 5, and 24 months. The effect of MRD on event-free surv ival was determined. Results, Seventy seven of 120 children with ALL had in formative markers and samples of remission marrow suitable for testing. Pre sence or absence of MRD did not significantly affect outcome. Gender (P < 0 .04) and white cell count (P < 0.04) were independent prognostic factors. A nalysis of only those cases with detectable MRD showed that cases with one blast per 100 mononuclear cells, or more, 28 days after starting treatment did worse than those with lower levels (hazard ratio 7.77, P < 0.02). Concl usions. Mere presence or absence of MRD is probably too crude a measure to be useful and worse than other standard prognostic indicators. A threshold of 10(-2) blasts at 28 days might be discriminatory, hut should not be over -interpreted. The number of patients available for this analysis (31) was s mall, the threshold and sampling points were arbitrary and any effects coul d be treatment regimen-specific. Large prospective studies are needed. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 36:365-371, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.