An intense cutoff low developed over the Great Lakes during the period 13-1
5 September 1996. The low developed as unseasonably cool air spread over th
e relatively warm water of the Great Lakes aggregate (i.e., all the Great L
akes). It eventually developed an eye, spiral rainbands, and a warm core, s
imilar to those in a hurricane.
This event presented some forecast challenges for the Nested Grid Model (NG
M) and Eta Model and hence for the National Weather Service. The NGM model
forecasted a weaker low (999 vs 993 hPa) to be centered east of the observe
d location, over Lake Huron. The Eta Model forecasted a slightly stronger l
ow (991 vs 993 hPa) to be centered even farther east than did the NGM, over
southern Ontario. As a result of the sea level pressure errors, both model
s also forecasted much weaker winds than were observed over the lakes and m
uch less precipitation around the lakeshores. The coarse resolution in both
models likely contributed significantly to these errors.
With-lake (WL) and no-lake (NL) simulations were performed with the Nationa
l Center for Atmospheric Research-Pennsylvania State University mesoscale m
odel MM5 to determine the impacts of the Great Lakes on development of the
low. The WL simulation agreed well with the observations. At the surface, t
he intensity and position of the WL low was within 1.7 hPa and 70 km at 30
h into the simulation (1800 UTC 14 September 1996), when the observed low w
as most intense. To the extent that the impact of the Great Lakes can be as
certained through comparison of the simulations, selected WL-NL differences
at the surface revealed that the lakes deepened the WL low by similar to5-
7 hPa and restricted its movement.
A comparison of WL and NL simulations at upper levels revealed equally impr
essive differences (e.g., lake-induced perturbations). Strong negative (pos
itive) height and meso-alpha -scale cyclonic (anticyclonic) wind perturbati
ons at 850 (300) hPa support the hypothesis that the Great Lakes were instr
umental in generating a warm core and strong winds near the surface. A comp
arison of WL-NL differences for this case are compared with those from a mo
re typical wintertime case to illustrate that the WL-NL perturbations can b
e more intense and can extend to considerably greater depths than in typica
l winter cases. Strong latent heat fluxes, low static stability, and slow m
ovement (e.g., the cut-off nature) of the synoptic-scale low allowed the st
rong heating and moistening from the Great Lakes to extend to midtropospher
ic levels for an extended period of time.