Quantitative analysis of Tc-99(m)-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT using a three-dimensional reference heart: a comparison with experienced observers
Hj. Verbeme et al., Quantitative analysis of Tc-99(m)-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT using a three-dimensional reference heart: a comparison with experienced observers, NUCL MED C, 22(2), 2001, pp. 155-163
Background Quantification of myocardial perfusion single photon emission co
mputed tomography (SPECT) may improve scintigraphic analysis. Recently, a f
ully operator independent technique for the quantification of myocardial pe
rfusion SPECT was described, based on a normal three-dimensional averaged r
eference heart. The purpose of this study was to compare the automated SPEC
T quantification technique with experienced observers.
Methods A total of 43 patients, 36 with one-vessel coronary artery disease
(CAD) and seven with a low likelihood of CAD, underwent (99)Tcm-sestamibi S
PECT (Tc-99(m)-MIBI SPECT). Three experienced observers and a panel (compos
ed of the three observers), blinded to the clinical and angiographic data,
analysed the size and severity of perfusion defects and the relation to the
distribution areas of the coronary arteries. Inter-observer agreement was
calculated by using kappa (kappa) statistics.
Results The inter-observer agreement between the human observers and the au
tomated quantitative analysis, for severity and size of perfusion abnormali
ty, was moderate (kappa range 0.38-0.68), while this was fair between three
individual observers (kappa range 0.36-0.87) and good between the individu
al observers and the panel (kappa range 0.63-0.89). There were no differenc
es between the quantitative analysis and the panel in the allocation of per
fusion abnormalities to the affected coronary artery.
Conclusions The operator independent quantification method showed a moderat
e agreement with individual observers and a panel analysis for size and sev
erity of perfusion abnormalities. The automatic quantification has a simila
r ability to assign perfusion abnormalities to the diseased coronary artery
as compared to an expert panel. ((C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins).