This investigation studied the three-body abrasive wear resistance and wear
patterns of five composite restoratives. The possible relation between thr
ee-body wear and surface hardness was also investigated. A three-body wear
instrumentation was used to investigate the wear resistance of five composi
te restoratives [Silux Plus (SX), Z100 (20), Ariston pHc (AR), Surefil (SF)
and Tetric Ceram (TC)]. An amalgam alloy [Dispersalloy (DA)] was used as c
ontrol. The amalgam alloy (DA) had the lowest three-body wear (0.3+/-0.27 m
um) and the highest surface hardness (KHN 131.5+/-27.87). TC had the most w
ear (2.14+/-0.58 mum) and SX was the softest restorative (KHN 34.04+/-2.73)
. Ranking was as follows: Wear resistance-DA>ZO>SF>AR>SX>TC; Hardness-DA>SF
>ZO>TC>AR>SX With the exception of ZO, DA was significantly more wear resis
tant than all the composites evaluated. ZO was significantly more wear resi
stant than SX and TC. DA was significant;ly harder than all the composites
evaluated. SF was significantly harder than AR and SX For the composite res
toratives, correlation between hardness and wear was significant, with a co
rrelation coefficient of r=-0.45. A significant negative but weak correlati
on exists between hardness and three-body wear of composite restoratives.