The presidential addresses of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR)
of the past decade convey a consistency of format and themes. They highligh
t significant weaknesses in some of the basic questions and methodologies o
f psychotherapy researchers. These include neglect of topics concerning the
understanding of change and over-valuation of the randomized clinical tria
l (RCT). Although valid, the criticisms neglect the strengths of RCTs, whic
h are illustrated by a series of psychotherapy clinical trials conducted by
the author's research team, and run the risk of polarizing psychotherapy r
esearchers. The new millennium is an appropriate time to acknowledge how di
fferent methodologies complement each other and advance knowledge in ways t
hat could not occur in the absence of others. SPR is an international, mult
idisciplinary scientific organization that emphasizes inclusiveness. Nevert
heless, it, as well as other organizations, can further enhance its contrib
ution to the field by extending its range of collaboration to include under
represented researchers. disciplines, and research-oriented clinicians.