This essay first describes some of the impressive theoretical and empirical
contributions of The Sociology of Philosophies. namely: to cultural sociol
ogy: Second, it offers a criticism of Collins's argument by focusing on the
conceptions of the self it posits; its lack of specificity concerning the
relationship between intellectual networks and imagined communities of scho
lars: and its neglect of how the law of small numbers is affected by the si
ze of a field Against a priori definitions of the selves of intellectuals p
osited by Collins, I advocate approaching the diversity. of their selves as
an empirical issue. Against Collins's overemphasis on personal network cen
trality in the making of philosophical greatness, I propose that the transc
endent values of intellectual work are insufficient but nonetheless necessa
ry conditions for philosophical greatness.