In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theor
ies to the history of philosophy. While Collins's marcrosociology of knowle
dge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectua
l field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular. Collins's m
icro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. T
his leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Neverthel
ess, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself
As in philosophy we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration
of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited
resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Colli
ns calls the intellectual attention space.