Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: Comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters

Citation
Sm. Bose et al., Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: Comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters, SURG TODAY, 31(2), 2001, pp. 117-122
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
09411291 → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
117 - 122
Database
ISI
SICI code
0941-1291(2001)31:2<117:EOTPOC>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
This prospective study was performed to assess the predictive ability of th e various indicators of common bile duct (CBD) calculi, individually or in combination, by analyzing 88 patients with gallstone disease. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of 10 predefined criteria. Of 53 patients with one or more risk factors (group 2), 26 harbor ed CBD calculi; none of 35 patients with no risk factors (group 1) had CBD stones. Jaundice correlated best, with a sensitivity of 69%; and pancreatit is had the lowest sensitivity (12%). Elevated serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels correlated better than liver enzymes and serum amylase. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of cholescintigraphy scanning for diagnosing CBD calculi were better than those of ultrasonography, the sensitivity being 84% versus 50% and the negative predictive value 95% vers us 82%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography was successful in 94% of the patients, and CBD calculi were diagnosed in 74%. Moreover, perop erative cholangiography was 100% sensitive with no false-positive results. Ultimately, a palpable stone at surgery was the best predictor. When all th e criteria were analyzed, it was found that as the number of criteria incre ased so did the percentage of patients harboring CBD calculi.