Based on TONNIES and WEBER, the author discusses three variants of a post-t
raditional concept of community. All three are characterized by the fact th
at they substitute the dichotomy of community and society by a far more com
plex network of concepts. While all attempts to revitalize Aristotelism hav
e a hard time bringing into line a necessarily elitist Republican ideal of
virtuosity with the egalitarian premises of a functionally differentiated s
ociety, pragmatism operates, from the start, with an egalitarian concept of
community. It is, however, characterized by a juridical-theoretical defici
t. This may be rectified by going back to the paradigmatic connection betwe
en Democratic communal power and the state's legal power, as was characteri
stic of the democratization of the concept of sovereignty in the era of enl
ightenment, starting with Spinoza.