Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris

Citation
D. Carrie et al., Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris, AM J CARD, 87(6), 2001, pp. 693-698
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029149 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
693 - 698
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(20010315)87:6<693:CODCSW>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement wit h and without balloon predilatation on duration of the procedure, reduction of procedure-related costs, and clinical outcomes. Although preliminary tr ials of direct coronary stenting have demonstrated promising results, the l ack of randomized studies with long-term follow-up has limited the critical evaluation of the role of direct stenting in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Between January and September 1999, 338 patients w ere randomly assigned to either direct stent implantation (DS+; 173 patient s) or standard stent implantation with balloon predilatation (DS-; 165 pati ents). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in t he 2 groups. Procedural success was achieved in 98.3% of patients assigned to DSS and 97.5% of patients assigned to DS- (p = NS), with a crossover rat e of 13.9%. Compared with DS-, DSS conferred a dramatic reduction in proced ure-related cost ($956.4 +/- $352.2 vs $1,164.6 +/- $383.9, p <0.0001) and duration of the procedure (424.2 +/- 412.1 vs 634.5 +/- 390.1 seconds, p <0 .0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, repeat angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 5. 3% in DS+ and 11.4% in DS- (p = NS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated tha t major adverse cardiac events rates were related to stent length of 10 mm (relative risk [RR] 3.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.36 to 7.78; p = 0 .008), stent diameter of 3 mm (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.06; p = 0.043), an d complex lesion type C (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.02 to 7.85; p = 0.045). Thus, in selected patients, this prospective randomized study shows the feasibility of DS+ with reduction in procedural cost and length, and without an increa se in in-hospital clinical events and major adverse cardiac events at 6-mon th follow-up. (C) 2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.