Dg. Lumsdon et al., Use of solid phase characterisation and chemical modelling for assessing the behaviour of arsenic in contaminated soils, APPL GEOCH, 16(6), 2001, pp. 571-581
A soil, containing waste material from an industrially contaminated site, w
as found to be heavily contaminated with several heavy metals and As. A ris
k assessment for As leaching from this material has been carried out in sev
eral stages, collation and examination of historical records, solid-phase c
haracterization and chemical modelling. The historical record indicates tha
t the most probable source of As was arsenopyrite. However, the solid phase
characterization of the soil, using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning elec
tron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive microanalysis (EDAX), did not
yield any direct evidence for pyritic phases, although there was clear evid
ence of known pyrite-weathering products, such as jarosite, The relative st
ability of pyrite and arsenopyrite have been modelled for the range of acid
ity and redox potentials likely to be encountered on the site. For adsorpti
on modelling, a surface complexation model was used to predict arsenate des
orption as a function of pH. It was assumed that the principal reactive ads
orbent for As was hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) and this assumption was suppor
ted by the results of direct and indirect measurements and by the mineral s
tability calculations. This approach was successful at predicting the incre
ased mobility of As at increasingly alkaline conditions. The modelling pred
ictions were supported by results from batch equilibration experiments. Thu
s, it was possible to link direct observations of mineralogy, mineral stabi
lity calculations and adsorption models in order to predict the mobility of
As. The success of this approach was dependent on identifying the reactive
phase in this particular soil and having the appropriate data required for
the adsorption modelling. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv
ed.