K. Ziegler et al., Palaeohydrodynamics of fluids in the Brent Group (Oseberg Field, NorwegianNorth Sea) from chemical and isotopic compositions of formation waters, APPL GEOCH, 16(6), 2001, pp. 609-632
Generally, the history of past sub-surface fluid movements is difficult to
reconstruct. However, the composition of oil-field waters characterizes the
origins and mixing processes that allow such a reconstruction. We have inv
estigated present-day formation waters from Brent Group sedimentary rocks o
f the Oseberg Field in order to assess both their geochemical variations, a
nd their origin(s). Water samples (sampled at the separator) produced from
immediately above the oil-water contact and from the aquifer (water-saturat
ed zone below the oil-water contact) were taken from 11 wells across the fi
eld. In addition, 3 trace water samples were extracted from oil produced fr
om higher up in the oil column. The water samples were analysed for their c
hemical components and isotopic compositions. Conservative tracers such as
Cl, Br, deltaD, and delta O-18 were used to evaluate the origin of the wate
rs. All formation waters can be characterised as Na-Cl-brines. The separato
r samples are of aquifer origin, indicating that aquifer water, drawn up by
the pressure reduction near the well, is produced from the lower few tens
of metres of the oil-zone. By defining plausible endmembers, the waters can
be described as mixtures of seawater (60-90%), meteoric water (10-30%), ev
aporated seawater (primary brines) (3-5%), and possibly waters which have d
issolved evaporites (secondary brines). Alternatively, using multidimension
al scaling, the waters can be described as mixtures of only 3 endmembers wi
thout presupposing their compositions. In fact, they are seawater, very dil
ute brine, and a secondary brine (confirming the power of this approach). M
eteoric water was introduced into the reservoir during the end-Brent and ea
rly-Cretaceous periods of emergence and erosion, and partially replaced the
marine pore fluids. Lateral chemical Variations across the Oseberg Field a
re extremely small. The waters from closer to the erosion surfaces show sli
ghtly stronger meteoric water isotopic signatures. The primary and secondar
y brines are believed to come from Permian and Triassic evaporitic rocks in
the deeply buried Viking Graben to the west, and to have been modified by
water-rock interactions along their migration path. These primary basinal b
rines have not been detected in the oil-zone waters, suggesting that the br
ines entered the reservoir after the main phase of oil-migration. There are
indications that these external fluids were introduced into the reservoir
along faults. Present-day aquifer waters are mixtures of waters from differ
ent origins and hardly vary at a field-scale. They are different in composi
tion to the water trapped in the present oil-zone. One of the oil-zone samp
les is a very dilute brine. It is thought to represent a simple mixture of
seawater and meteoric water. Due to oil-emplacement, this geochemical signa
ture was preserved in the waters trapped within the oil-zone. Another oil-z
one water shows a very similar chemical signature to the aquifer waters, bu
t the chlorine isotopic signature is similar to that of the dilute oil-zone
water. This water is interpreted to represent a palaeo-aquifer water. That
is, it was within the aquifer zone in the past, but was trapped by subsequ
ent emplacement of more oil. These Vertical differences can be explained by
two features: (i) emergence of the Brent Group sedimentary rocks in the Ea
rly Cretaceous allowed ingress of meteoric water; (ii) subsequent rapid bur
ial of Viking Graben rocks caused migration of petroleum and aqueous fluids
into the adjacent, less deeply buried Oseberg Field. (C) 2001 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd. All rights reserved.