Objectives: To assess the accuracy of a new noninvasive temporal artery (TA
) thermometer in infants; to compare the accuracy of the TA thermometer wit
h that of a tympanic thermometer, using rectal thermometry as the criterion
standard; and to compare the tolerability of the TA thermometer with that
of the tympanic and rectal thermometers.
Design: Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of TA and tympanic thermomet
ry, using rectal thermometry as the criterion standard. getting: Emergency
department of an urban pediatric hospital.
Subjects: Convenience sample of 304 infants younger than 1 year presenting
for care.
Main Outcome Measures: Temperatures were measured using TA, tympanic, and r
ectal thermometers for all infants. Agreement between TA or tympanic and re
ctal temperatures was assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of TA or ty
mpanic thermometers for detecting rectal fever were determined. Discomfort
scores, using a standardized scale, were assessed by trained observers afte
r each temperature measurement was made.
Results: Linear regression analysis of the relation between TA and rectal t
emperatures yielded a model with a slope of 0.79 (vs a slope of 0.68 for ty
mpanic vs rectal temperature; P=.02) and an r of 0.83 (vs r=0.75 for tympan
ic vs rectal temperature; P<.001). Among 109 patients with a rectal tempera
ture of 38<degrees>C or higher, the TA thermometer had a sensitivity of 0.6
6 compared with the tympanic thermometer's sensitivity of 0.49 (P<.001). Di
scomfort scores with TA thermometry were significantly lower than with rect
al thermometry (P=.007).
Conclusions: The TA thermometer has limited sensitivity for detecting cases
of rectal fever in infants. However, the TA thermometer is more accurate t
han the tympanic thermometer in infants, and it is better tolerated by infa
nts than rectal thermometry.