This study examined the categorization processes that Alzheimer`s disease (
AD) patients use during assessments of semantic memory. Rule-based categori
zation involves the careful, analytic processing of strict criteria ro dete
rmine category membership, particularly for items from graded categories wi
th ambiguous category membership; similarity-based categorization requires
an overall comparison of a test stimulus with a prototype or remembered exe
mplar of the category and is relatively effective for the rapid categorizat
ion of items with unambiguous category membership. To assess these processe
s in AD. patients were asked to decide the category membership of test stim
uli for categories with poorly defined or Fuzzy boundaries (e.g.. VEGETABLE
) and for categories with well-defined boundaries (e.g., FEMALE) and then r
o judge the representativeness of the test stimulus for its chosen category
. A subgroup of AD patients demonstrated a typical pattern of impaired sema
ntic memory compared to healthy control subjects; that is, difficulty decid
ing the category membership of rest items from furry categories. Among thes
e patients. we Found no deficit in category membership decisions about item
s taken from well-defined categories. We also found that AD patients and he
althy controls do not differ in their representativeness judgments of items
within a correctly judged category. These findings are most consistent wit
h the hypothesis that rule-based categorization difficulty limits semantic
memory in AD. (C); 2001 Academic Press.