This study applied meta-analysis to assess the relationship between charism
atic leadership style and leadership effectiveness, subordinate performance
, subordinate satisfaction subordinate effort, and subordinate commitment.
Results indicate that the relationship between leader charisma and leader e
ffectiveness is much weaker than reported in the published literature when
leader effectiveness is measured at the individual level of analysis and wh
en common method variance is controlled Results also indicate a smaller rel
ationship between charismatic leadership and subordinate performance when s
ubordinate performance is measured at the individual level (r = 0.31) than
when it is measured at the group level (r = 0.49 and robust across studies)
. These results suggest that charismatic leadership is mol-e effective at i
ncreasing group performance than at increasing individual performance. Othe
r moderators rested did not account for a significant portion of variance i
n the observed distribution of correlations, suggesting a need for further
research into other potential moderators. Mete-analysis examining the effec
ts of charismatic leadership on subordinate effort and job satisfaction rev
ealed lower correlations when multiple methods of measurement were used, wi
th little convergence toward stable population estimates.