What have we learned from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic theories?

Citation
Jj. Schentag et al., What have we learned from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic theories?, CLIN INF D, 32, 2001, pp. S39-S46
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
10584838 → ACNP
Volume
32
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
1
Pages
S39 - S46
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(20010315)32:<S39:WHWLFP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic characteristics and pharmacodynamic properties dictate anti microbial response and, along with natural immune responses, clinical outco mes. As new agents are developed with long half-lives, we will lose the abi lity to differentiate between concentration-dependent and time-dependent pr operties. The area under the inhibitory concentration curve (AUIC) defines drug regimens as a ratio of drug exposure to minimum inhibitory concentrati on (MIC) and allows them to be compared with each other. With AUIC and agen ts with long half-lives, these comparisons are possible regardless of chemi cal classification or concentration or time-dependent activity. Historical examples of reduced drug exposure from decreased doses (i.e., cefaclor, cla rithromycin, and ciprofloxacin), and thus low AUIC values, directly correla te with drug resistance. In the face of rising MICs (as is occurring worldw ide with Streptococcus pneumoniae), close attention to appropriate dosing a nd concentration above the MIC may delay and potentially even prevent antib iotic resistance. Creating selective pressure on reliable antibiotics by in appropriately reducing their doses will undoubtedly challenge these agents and may destroy entire drug classes with similar mechanisms of action or re sistance.